NEWS

What are you interested in?

All topics
Arts
Social Sciences
Life Sciences
Medicine
Management
Engineering
Law
Humanities
General
Exact Sciences
Environment

Research

Sep 17th, 2026
Can AI Really Decode Animal Language?

A new TAU study using toddler vocalizations reveals a fundamental challenge: AI can recognize patterns in sounds, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it understands what those sounds mean

 

  • Biology

In recent years, numerous attempts have been made to use artificial intelligence to decipher the communication of bats, whales, birds, and other animals. However, a new study led by a team of researchers from Tel Aviv University points to a fundamental problem with this approach: AI models focus on the physical properties of a sound, but this does not mean that they understand the meaning attributed to it by animal listening.

 

According to the researchers, sounds that are acoustically similar do not necessarily carry similar meanings, while sounds that appear different may convey the same information to the receiver. Therefore, classifying sounds according to their acoustic similarity, as is done in most studies, may create a misleading picture of the communication system and the meaning of the messages it conveys.

 

The study, published in the scientific journal Current Biology, was conducted by Mor Taub, Inbal Arnon, Amiyaal Ilany, Mirjam Knörnschild, Yoav Ram, and Prof. Yossi Yovel. The research team included scientists from Tel Aviv University, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the University of Edinburgh, the Museum für Naturkunde – Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

 

What Can Toddlers Teach Us About Animal Communication?

To investigate the problem, the researchers used a unique communication system: the vocalizations of human toddlers who have not yet fully developed speech. Unlike animal vocalizations, in this case the researchers can determine, at least to some extent, how the humans to whom the vocalizations are directed interpret them. The recordings included vocalizations made in three contexts: distress, calling to a specific person, the mother or the father and requesting food.

 

The researchers analyzed the recordings using a classical acoustic method and two deep state-of-the-art neural networks: one trained on animal vocalizations and another trained on adult human speech. The models were asked to group the vocalizations according to their characteristics.

 

Hearing a Pattern Is Not the Same as Understanding It

The results showed that the deep neural networks performed better than the classical acoustic method, but even they failed to classify the toddlers’ vocalizations according to their meaning. In some cases, they grouped together vocalizations carrying different messages; in others, they separated different vocalizations intended to convey the same message. The models also failed to identify how a sequence of vocalizations expressed increasing urgency, a distinction that the human ear perceives naturally.

 

According to the researchers, reliably deciphering animal communication will require combining AI tools with behavioral observations, playback experiments, and sometimes measurements of brain activity. Every species has its own unique perceptual world, and understanding what animals are “saying” therefore requires more than analyzing sound alone: it also requires examining how they hear the sound and respond to it.

 

Seeing Communication From the Animal’s Perspective

Prof. Yossi Yovel concludes: “In recent years, there has been growing excitement about the possibility of using artificial intelligence to decode animal communication, but our study shows that these promises should be treated with caution. Identifying acoustic patterns is not necessarily the same as deciphering meaning: to understand what an animal is ‘saying,’ we need to know how the animal receiving the message perceives it and responds to it. The path toward truly deciphering animal communication will require a combination of AI, behavioral observations, experiments, and research into the nervous system. Artificial intelligence is a powerful tool, but it is no substitute for the perspective of the animal itself.”

Research

Sep 14th, 2026
Through Foreign Eyes: How Filmmakers Captured a Young Israel

What were international filmmakers searching for in the young State of Israel, what did they find here, and what can their films teach us about the Israel of then and today?

 

  • Arts

“A chosen people, a wandering people, a tormented people, a murdered people, a people reborn. Israel has known struggle in all its forms.”

 

With these words, French filmmaker Chris Marker opens his 1960 documentary Description of a Struggle (Description d'un combat).

 

Marker came to Israel not to provide clear answers, but to try to understand a young country in the process of shaping its identity—and, in doing so, to reconsider some of his own perceptions. Yet seven years after the film was released, following the Six-Day War, Marker sought to limit its screenings. In his view, the political reality had changed so dramatically that the film no longer reflected his positions.

 

The film, which was barely screened in Israel for decades, became the starting point more than 60 years later for research by Dr. Ohad Landesman of the Steve Tisch School of Film and Television, supported by the Israel Science Foundation (ISF). Landesman’s research led to his book, Brief Encounters: Documentary Visits to an Imagined Israel, published this year by SUNY Press.

This story led Landesman to search for other filmmakers who visited Israel during the 1960s and 1970s, among them Pier Paolo Pasolini, Susan Sontag, and Claude Lanzmann. In their films, he found not only documentation of a young Israel, but also the perspectives of outsiders who came here to explore questions that preoccupied them personally.

These films returned to the screen at the 2026 Docaviv Film Festival as part of Imagined Land, a program curated by Landesman. The four films screened drew large audiences, with some screenings completely sold out. The response surprised Landesman somewhat—but also demonstrated just how relevant the research remains today.

From Location Hunting in Palestine, 1963. (Credit: Cineteca Nazionale)

 

Who Were the “Brief Encounters” and Why Israel?

 

They were some of the most prominent names in the cultural and cinematic world of their time. They came to Israel for short periods—sometimes just a few weeks—and were not attempting to conduct lengthy anthropological journeys. They arrived with questions, expectations, and sometimes a preconceived image of the country. They filmed, observed, and returned home.

 

But why Israel? For these filmmakers, Israel was far more than a place to make a film. The young country was perceived as a kind of “laboratory of ideas”: a place where major questions about the Holocaust and rebirth, Zionism, religion, nationalism, war, and socialism converged.

 

Some arrived with sympathy for and curiosity about the Zionist project, while others sought to examine the gap between the image of Israel and the reality they encountered. For all of them, to varying degrees, Israel became a place through which they could explore larger ideas—and sometimes their own personal positions as well.

 

Landesman describes these works as “essay films”: films that do not claim to present a complete, objective picture, but instead use documentary filmmaking as a way to think, question, and deliberate. “They are primarily films about the relationship between the filmmaker and the destination, rather than about the destination itself,” Landesman explains.

 

What You See From Here, You Don’t See From There

 

Most of the films examined in the research were made between 1960 and 1974, when Israel was still a very young country. The filmmakers arrived with powerful images of the country in mind: a miracle that had emerged from the ruins of the Holocaust, a unique Zionist project, and a society attempting to create a new model of life.

 

The kibbutz particularly captured their imagination. They saw it as a kind of democratic and socialist bubble—an expression of the new Israeli vision. But their encounter with reality proved more complicated.

 

Again and again, the films document the gap between the expectations the filmmakers brought with them and what they actually encountered: contradictions, tensions, social and economic disparities, and a reality that did not always correspond to the idealized picture they had imagined.

 

Precisely because they came from outside, these filmmakers were often able to notice developments that local society—and Israeli cinema at the time—still struggled to see.

 

Susan Sontag: Seeing the Trauma

From Promised Lands, 1974. (Credit: Cineteca Nazionale)

 

One striking example is Promised Lands (1974), by Susan Sontag, the prominent American intellectual and cultural figure.

 

Sontag arrived in Israel immediately after the Yom Kippur War. Rather than documenting the war itself, she became interested in its effects on Israeli society.

 

One of the film’s most difficult moments takes place at Assaf Harofeh Hospital, where she documents an experimental treatment being given to a soldier suffering from combat trauma. Sontag remains in the room and observes the treatment, which includes a chilling audio reconstruction of the battle played beside the soldier’s bed.

 

For Landesman, the scene demonstrates the power of an outsider’s perspective: Sontag did not simply document a wounded soldier. Through the experimental treatment of his trauma, she identified something broader—an allegory for a country itself experiencing paranoia, panic, and trauma.

 

“Not Time Capsules”: Why Do These Films Still Speak to Us Today?

From Description of a Struggle, 1960. (Credit: Cineteca Nazionale)

 

These films are not “time capsules” that tell us only about the Israel of the 1960s and 1970s. Precisely because they do not offer unequivocal answers, they allow us to reconsider questions that still occupy us today: What does Israel look like from the outside, and how does that differ from the way we see it from within? What are we unable to see that an outsider’s perspective makes visible?

 

According to Landesman, part of the films’ relevance lies in the fact that some of them still sound prophetic today. At the end of Chris Marker’s 1960 film, for example, the camera focuses on a 12-year-old girl—the same age as the State of Israel that year—as she paints on a canvas. The narration turns to the dangers facing the young country and emphasizes:

 

“Justice on the soil of Israel will be worse than injustice anywhere else.”

 

It is a chilling and prophetic moment, and like other moments in the films discussed in the book, it invites viewers to look at Israel through different eyes—and perhaps to look at themselves again as well.

 

Landesman argues that these films deserve to be revisited in 2026 and remain highly relevant to our present. In the 1960s and 1970s, Israel enjoyed broader international “credit” than it does today, at a time when Israel is perceived as an “outcast” and feels like a “pariah” in the world.

 

While today’s discourse tends to be dogmatic and polarized, the films Landesman studied offer a more complex perspective. Their creators display considerable intellectual curiosity toward Israel and underscore the need to see the country beyond a one-dimensional political “casting.”

 

Ultimately, the films made by these “brief visitors” do not provide clear answers about Israel. Instead, they do something else: they formulate questions and bring back a perspective that still allows us to ask those questions anew.

Research

Sep 10th, 2026
Can Antibodies Reach Inside Brain Cells?

A new masking technology could expand the potential of antibody-based therapies for diseases such as Parkinson’s

 

 

  • Medicine

Over the past few decades, antibody-based therapies have revolutionized modern medicine and are now widely used to treat cancer, autoimmune diseases, inflammatory disorders, and even infectious diseases. Despite their success, however, antibodies have a significant limitation: they struggle to penetrate cells and are therefore largely limited to targeting molecules located on the cell surface or outside the cell. In addition, antibody-based drugs have difficulty crossing the blood-brain barrier, restricting their use in treating diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. Now, researchers at Tel Aviv University, together with colleagues, have developed a new technology that could overcome these barriers, enabling antibodies to reach the most important targets, those located inside the cell itself.

 

The technology was developed through a collaboration between research groups from Cornell University in the United States, Tel Aviv University, and the Technion. The study was led by Prof. Chris  A. Alabi and Prof. Matthew P. DeLisa from Cornell, collaborating with Prof. Avi Schroder from the Technion and TAU’s Prof. Ben Maoz of the Fleischman Faculty of Engineering and the Sagol School of Neuroscience and Prof. Uri Ashery of the Wise Faculty of Life Sciences and the Sagol School of Neuroscience, together with Prof. Christopher Alabi of Cornell. The findings were published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

 

A Temporary “Mask” for Antibodies

In the study, the researchers developed an innovative approach based on temporarily “masking” the antibody using a synthetic molecule called SL4. This masking alters the antibody’s chemical properties in a controlled manner, allowing it to be encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), similar to the technology used to develop mRNA vaccines against COVID-19. Once the nanoparticles enter the cell, the antibody is released and regains its original structure and activity.

 

According to the researchers, this represents a significant breakthrough because approximately 80% of the proteins involved in human disease are located inside cells, making them inaccessible to most antibody-based therapies. The ability to deliver active antibodies into the cell cytoplasm opens new possibilities for treating diseases that have long been considered inaccessible to drug-based interventions.

 

The study demonstrated that the masking process significantly improves the efficiency with which antibodies can be encapsulated within lipid nanoparticles. Whereas unmodified antibodies were incorporated into the nanoparticles with relatively low efficiency, the masked antibodies achieved substantially higher encapsulation rates while retaining their stability and their ability to recognize the molecular target associated with the disease.

 

Reaching Targets Inside the Cell

The researchers tested the technology using a series of therapeutic antibodies targeting key biological pathways involved in disease development. The antibodies successfully entered cells and altered important signaling pathways associated with various types of cancer and inflammatory diseases. Following treatment, the activity of these pathways was significantly reduced, indicating that the antibodies had reached their intended targets and remained active inside the cells.

 

One of the study’s most promising findings emerged from a research model of Parkinson’s disease. The researchers used an antibody targeting alpha-synuclein, a protein whose accumulation in the brain is one of the hallmarks features of the disease. Following delivery of the antibody via the nanoparticles, they observed a significant reduction in the pathological aggregates of the protein in nerve cells, a finding that suggests that the technology could pave the way for new treatments for neurodegenerative diseases.

 

Beyond the Brain

The technology was also evaluated in a model of acute inflammatory lung injury. The researchers found that delivering antibodies via the lipid nanoparticles reduced inflammatory markers and improved pathological features of lung tissue. These findings highlight the potential for developing targeted therapies for severe inflammatory conditions.

 

Prof. Ben Maoz said: “For many years, delivering antibodies into cells has been considered one of the greatest challenges in the field of biologic therapies. We have succeeded in developing a system that enables antibodies to cross the cellular barrier and reach targets that were previously beyond their reach. We believe this is an important step toward expanding the therapeutic toolbox of modern medicine and paving the way for more precise treatments for complex diseases that still lack adequate therapeutic solutions.”

 

Toward a New Generation of Biologic Therapies

The researchers emphasize that the technology is still at the preclinical stage. Nevertheless, they believe the platform could lay the foundation for a new generation of biologic therapies. If it successfully progresses through development and clinical trials, it could, for the first time, enable the widespread use of antibodies against intracellular targets,  a goal widely regarded in the pharmaceutical industry as the next frontier of personalized medicine.

Research

Aug 17th, 2026
Why Do Men and Women Walk Differently?

A new TAU study of Neandertal and modern human pelvises suggests that the male pelvis evolved a natural shock-absorbing mechanism that may make long-distance walking more efficient.

 

 

  • Biology

A new study at the Department of Anatomy and Anthropology of Tel Aviv University, and published in Scientific Reports, offers an explanation for one of the striking differences between men and women: the evolutionary development of the modern human pelvis. By comparing Neandertal pelvises with those of modern humans, the researchers reached a surprising conclusion: the unusual structure of the pelvis may not be that of the Neandertal, as has been assumed for decades, but rather that of the modern human male. According to the researchers, the male pelvis evolved into a unique biomechanical shock absorbing mechanism that stores energy and makes long-distance walking more efficient.

 

Led by Professor Yoel Rak of the Department of Anatomy and Anthropology at Tel Aviv University, and conducted in collaboration with researchers from Spain, the Technion, Bar-Ilan University, and Ono Academic College, the study is based on a comparison of two nearly complete male Neandertal pelvises, one from Kebara Cave in Israel  and the other from the Sima de los Huesos site in Spain, with dozens of modern human pelvises. Surprisingly, despite their large size and robust construction, the Neandertal pelvises were found to resemble those of modern human females in most measurements and proportions rather than those of modern human males.

 

Rethinking the Neandertal Pelvis

For many years, the Neandertal pelvis has been regarded as an anatomically unusual structure requiring a functional explanation of its own. The new findings, however, require a new look at Neandertal pelvises. The ancestral configuration may have been retained in Neandertals and in modern human females, while the modern human male pelvis underwent substantial evolutionary modification, giving rise to a distinctive anatomical configuration.

 

The central finding of the study is that the hip joints of modern human males are positioned farther forward on the pelvic ring than those of both modern human females and male Neandertals. According to the researchers, this shift created a new mechanical system in which the anterior thigh muscles, attached to the front of the pelvis, function much like a spring, while body weight acts on the posterior part of the pelvis .

 

The Neanderthal pelvis

 

A Natural Spring in Every Step

Professor Rak explains that during every step of bipedal walking, the body's center of mass drops downward. This drop traumatizes  the joints and requires energy to raise the body again in preparation for the next step. According to the new model, the distinctive geometry of the male pelvis enables the thigh muscles to cushion the drop of the body's center of mass, store potential energy during the step, and then release that energy immediately afterward- effectively "springing" the body upward into the next step.

 

In this way, the pelvis functions as a natural shock-absorber and energy-return system. It may reduce energy expenditure, improve walking efficiency, and thereby provide a significant advantage during long-distance travel on foot. The change in the position of the hip joints also required additional structural adaptations, including the thickening of the pubic bone and deepening of the anterior portion of the pelvis to withstand the new mechanical loads.

 

Why Did Male and Female Pelvises Evolve Differently?

Modern human females, by contrast, could not adopt the full suite of these modifications. According to the researchers, the constraints imposed by childbirth require a relatively shallow pelvis and a sufficiently wide birth canal. As a result, the female pelvis remains closer to the ancestral configuration—the same general configuration found in male Neandertals.

 

Professor Ella Been of Ono Academic College, a co-author of the study, adds: “This study demonstrates that questions about human evolution are not confined to the distant past. Understanding the evolution of our walking mechanism can contribute to contemporary research in biomechanics, musculoskeletal medicine, rehabilitation, and injury prevention. The perspective provided by the Neandertals helps us better understand the modern human body.”

 

 

A reconstruction of the skeleton

 

The Evolutionary Innovation May Be Us

Professor Rak emphasizes that the findings of the study change the way we understand the evolution of the human pelvis. It is not the Neandertal pelvis that is the anomaly requiring explanation. Rather, it is the pelvis of the modern human male. The mechanism that evolved within the human male represents the evolutionary innovation.

 

The researchers note that the study presents a new biomechanical model that may explain a substantial part of the human pelvis’s sexual dimorphism, the anatomical differences between females and males. The research also demonstrates that even in human macroscopic anatomy, a field that might appear to have been thoroughly explored, there is still potential to uncover previously unrecognized structures, geometries, and mechanisms of biological significance.

Research

Aug 10th, 2026
Simple Blood Test on a Chip Could Help Diagnose Lung Cancer

A new TAU technology identifies lung cancer’s biological fingerprint with more than 90% accuracy, without DNA sequencing, and could also help monitor patients’ response to treatment.

 

 

  • Medicine

 

Researchers at Tel Aviv University have developed a new method for diagnosing lung cancer: a simple, fast, low-cost blood test that does not require DNA sequencing. The method identifies a chemical fingerprint of cancer cells in the blood, by analyzing cell-free DNA originating from those cells. In the study, the test distinguished between lung cancer patients and healthy individuals with a sensitivity of 93.1% and a specificity of 90.3% for patients with stage 2-4 disease.

 

The study was led by Prof. Yuval Ebenstein of the School of Chemistry at the Faculty of Exact Sciences, the Department of Biomedical Engineering and the Zimin Institute at Tel Aviv University, in collaboration with researchers from JaxBio Technologies, Bnai Zion Medical Center, and Sheba Medical Center. The paper was published in the journal Nature Precision Oncology.

 

A Different Approach to Lung Cancer Detection

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. At present, early diagnosis relies primarily on CT scans, but these tests generate a high rate of suspicious findings that ultimately prove to be benign, sometimes leading to unnecessary biopsies and surgeries. At the same time, existing liquid biopsies are generally based on DNA sequencing, a costly and complex process requiring advanced computational infrastructures.

 

The new method bypasses the need for DNA sequencing. After extracting cell-free DNA from a blood sample, the researchers label it with a light-emitting marker and bind it to a DNA chip they have developed. The chip is then scanned with an optical scanner, and the resulting light patterns are analyzed, enabling rapid identification of the biological fingerprint of lung cancer.

 

Conceptual illustration of a man with lung cancer

 

More Than 90% Diagnostic Accuracy

The study included 103 participants: 51 lung cancer patients and 52 healthy control subjects. Following a model-training phase, the researchers developed a signature of 170 genomic regions, and tested it on a separate validation cohort using blinded analysis, achieving high diagnostic accuracy. In addition, they were able to distinguish between the two main subtypes of lung cancer - adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma - based on distinct DNA signatures.

 

Illustration of the biological “fingerprint” test — a lung cancer patient on the right and an individual without cancer on the left

 

Could the Same Test Help Monitor Treatment?

Beyond diagnosis, the researchers also examined the novel test's potential for monitoring patients' response to treatment. Among the patients evaluated, changes in the DNA's chemical fingerprint corresponded to imaging findings: in patients who responded to treatment, the chemical fingerprint shifted toward the profile of healthy individuals, whereas no significant change was observed in patients who did not respond to treatment. The researchers emphasize that this is only a preliminary finding and that large-scale studies are needed to confirm the method's monitoring capabilities.

 

According to the researchers, the technology's main advantage lies in combining simplicity, low cost, and speed. At present, the test can be completed within two to three days at a cost of approximately $60 per sample. They hope that in the future it will serve to complement imaging tests, assist in the early diagnosis of lung cancer, and enable more effective monitoring of treatment effectiveness.

 

Prof. Ebenstein concludes: "Our goal is to make blood tests for cancer diagnosis more accessible, simpler, and less expensive without compromising accuracy. We have developed a new approach that does not require genetic sequencing but instead identifies the tumor's chemical 'fingerprint' with light, using a technology that can be implemented in standard clinical laboratories. This is a significant step toward developing a tool that can complement imaging tests and help physicians diagnose lung cancer and monitor treatment effectiveness."

 

Watch to learn more:

 

 

 

Research

Aug 4th, 2026
Emigration from Israel Remains at Record Levels, New TAU Study Finds

Nearly 270,000 Israelis left the country over the past three years, as researchers warn the trend could have long-term economic and security implications.

 

 

  • Social Sciences

 

A new study from Tel Aviv University presents the first available data on emigration from Israel in 2025, indicating that the increase in departures that began in 2023 has continued.

 

According to the study, 90,922 Israeli citizens left Israel for at least three consecutive months in 2025, compared with 91,499 in 2024 and 86,509 in 2023. Together, these three years represent the highest levels recorded during the study period. By comparison, 183,219 Israelis left the country for at least three consecutive months during the corresponding three-year period a decade earlier (2013–2015).

 

The study is based on data from the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS). It was conducted by Prof. Itai Ater of the Coller School of Management and Head of the Economists for Democracy Forum, Prof. Nittai Bergman, Head of the School of Economics, and Doron Zamir, a doctoral student at the Coller School of Management, all at Tel Aviv University.

Number of Israelis leaving Israel for three consecutive months each year between 2009 and 2025

 

¹ To exclude immigrants who lived in Israel only briefly before leaving, Israelis are defined as Israeli citizens who had lived in Israel for at least three years prior to departure.

 

A New Measure for Tracking Emigration

The researchers explain that in their previous publication on emigration from Israel, released in February 2026, they relied on the standard measure of remaining outside Israel for 12 months or longer. Because official data based on that measure will only become available for 2025 at the beginning of 2027, the current study instead examines Israelis who remained abroad for at least three consecutive months.

 

According to the researchers:

"In our previous publications on emigration from Israel (February 2026), we relied on the standard measure: remaining outside of Israel for 12 months or longer. For 2025, such a measure will only become available at the beginning of 2027. Thus, to identify emigration trends now rather than wait until 2027, we present data on emigration from Israel based on a measure of leaving Israel for at least 3 months."

To evaluate whether this shorter measure provides a reliable indication of longer-term emigration, the researchers compared the number of Israelis who remained abroad for at least three consecutive months with those who stayed abroad for 12 months or longer.

 

 Number of Israelis leaving Israel for at least three consecutive months and for a period of 12 months

 

The comparison revealed a very strong correlation (0.96) between the two measures. Based on this relationship, the researchers estimate that between 45,000 and 50,000 Israelis are likely to have remained abroad for 12 months or longer during 2025, assuming the historical relationship between the two measures continues to hold.

 

The researchers conclude that the wave of emigration that began in 2023 continued through 2025, remaining at historically high levels.

 

Prof. Ater says:

"In 2025 we continue to see very troubling numbers of Israelis leaving the country for a significant period of time, adding to the 2023-24 wave of emigration. Taken by themselves, these figures do not yet pose a risk to Israel's resilience. However, looking ahead—and unless there is a change—there is growing concern that rising emigration from Israel might jeopardize the country's future security and economy."

 

Why Monitor Emigration Trends?

The researchers note that emigration has long been part of Israel's public discourse, including debates surrounding "brain drain" and broader discussions about Israelis leaving the country. They write that public attention to the issue increased following the November 2022 elections, the debate surrounding the government's proposed judicial overhaul, and later intensified after the October 7 war.

 

According to the researchers, timely migration data are important for informing public policy and improving understanding of the phenomenon and its possible implications for Israel's economy and society.

 

They also note that despite the importance of the topic, public discussions often rely on delayed or incomplete data. To address this gap, the current study combines CBS migration records with additional information on emigrants' characteristics, including higher education data from the Council for Higher Education, professional licensing records from the Ministry of Health, and income and tax data from the Israel Tax Authority.

 

A Shift from Previous Migration Patterns

The researchers found that migration patterns changed significantly beginning in 2023.

 

After many years of relatively stable migration balances, nearly 270,000 Israelis left the country for at least three consecutive months between 2023 and 2025, averaging approximately 90,000 departures per year. During the decade between 2010 and 2019, the comparable annual figure was approximately 60,000.

 

The researchers also refer to findings from their previous publication, which identified increased emigration among physicians, PhD holders, engineers, and individuals with academic degrees and/or relatively high incomes.

 

International Context

The researchers emphasize that emigration of highly skilled populations is not unique to Israel. They cite countries including Greece, Hungary, Venezuela, Argentina, South Africa, and Lebanon as examples of nations that have experienced substantial emigration among highly educated or economically strong populations.

 

However, they argue that Israel's economy may be particularly sensitive to such trends because it relies heavily on high-quality human capital, especially in high-tech, advanced healthcare, academia, and other knowledge-intensive sectors.

 

According to the researchers, these sectors depend on relatively small numbers of highly trained professionals whose departure could have disproportionate economic consequences.

 

Looking Ahead

The researchers stress that current emigration levels do not, by themselves, constitute a threat to the Israeli economy.

 

Instead, they argue that the primary concern is the disruption of the long-standing migration balance and the possibility that emigration could continue to rise. They suggest that additional political, economic, or security-related shocks could encourage further departures, potentially creating a feedback effect in which rising emigration encourages additional people to leave.

 

According to the researchers, if emigration were to exceed a certain threshold, reversing the trend could become extremely difficult, with broader macroeconomic consequences.

 

Definition of an Emigrant (Three-Month Measure)

For the purposes of this study, an Israeli is defined as an emigrant if the following conditions are met:

  • Remaining outside Israel for at least three consecutive months from the date of departure.
  • For new immigrants: having lived in Israel for at least three years before departure, in addition to the first condition.

For comparison with the standard measure used in the researchers' previous publications, an additional criterion applies:

  • Remaining outside Israel for more than 270 days during the first year following departure.

 

Tel Aviv University makes every effort to respect copyright. If you own copyright to the content contained
here and / or the use of such content is in your opinion infringing Contact us as soon as possible >>